Scouting Report: Weaknesses

• Production doesn't match the elite athletic profile - just 4.5 career sacks despite significant playing time raises questions about his finishing ability.
• Raw pass rush plan relies too heavily on athletic gifts rather than technical refinement, lacking consistent counter moves when initial rush stalls.
• Hand usage remains underdeveloped, often being late to engage which allows blockers to get into his frame and control the point of attack.
• Struggles to convert pressures into sacks - generates consistent disruption (39 pressures in 2024) but can't finish plays at the quarterback.
• Can play with inconsistent pad level, particularly when fatigued, negating his natural leverage advantage and allowing blockers to control him.

Scouting Report: Summary

The film shows a defensive force tailor-made for an aggressive 4-3 system where he can pin his ears back and attack upfield. Stewart's explosive get-off and natural power, now validated by historic combine numbers (4.59 forty at 267 pounds with a blistering 1.58 10-yard split), translate perfectly to a wide-9 alignment, allowing him to set a devastating edge while maintaining the flexibility to reduce inside on passing downs. His ability to stack and shed while maintaining gap integrity will make him a day one starter against the run.

The pass rush toolkit needs expansion, but the raw materials are there in spades. When Stewart converts his speed to power, he destroys offensive tackles' anchor and collapses the pocket with frightening consistency. That foundation, combined with his rare bend at 267 pounds and jaw-dropping 40" vertical and 10'11" broad jump, suggests a ceiling as a dominant three-down defender once his hand usage catches up to his physical gifts. The 39 pressures he generated in 2024 despite just 2 sacks hints at a player on the verge of putting it all together.

Looking at the tape, Stewart's athletic profile now invites Myles Garrett comparisons based purely on testing numbers, but that's where the similarities largely end. While Garrett entered the draft with refined technique and dominant production (31 sacks in three seasons at Texas A&M), Stewart remains somewhat raw with underdeveloped hand usage and just 4.5 career sacks. The physical tools might test similarly, but Garrett was a polished product while Stewart is still very much a projection based more on traits than tape. The flashes are there but inconsistent, and teams must decide if they're willing to gamble a top-10 pick on athletic upside over proven production - a bet that has burned many NFL front offices before. After his combine performance, the Myles Garrett athletic comparisons will inevitably follow, but teams should proceed with caution. Stewart has launched himself into top-10 consideration based on testing alone, but his tape shows a player who badly needs technical refinement and consistency. The potential is tantalizing yet uncertain - he could develop into a defensive cornerstone or become the latest cautionary tale of prioritizing combine numbers over college production.