Dante Moore QB Oregon | NFL Draft Profile & Scouting Report
Dante Moore QB Oregon
NFL Draft Profile & Scouting Report
| PLAY STYLE: Pocket Passer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Updated: 05/30/2025 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Draft Year: 2026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 40 time: 4.90 seconds (34%*) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Age: 20.0 DOB: 05/24/2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SHARE THIS PROFILE:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PLAY STYLE: Pocket Passer | |
| Last Updated: 05/30/2025 | |
| Draft Year: 2026 | |
| 40 time: 4.90 seconds (34%*) | |
| Age: 20.0 DOB: 05/24/2005 | |
|
SHARE THIS PROFILE:
|
| Overall Rating: | 79.9 / 100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating of opposition Defense player has faced | ||
| Defense Rating: |
|
77% |
| Click the links below to view how player ranks vs other prospects. | ||
| Release Speed: |
|
84% |
| Short Passing: |
|
58% |
| Medium Passing: |
|
65% |
| Long Passing: |
|
80% |
| Rush/Scramble: |
|
50% |
|
DRAFT PROJECTION:
7th
Overall Rank:
#230
Position rank:
#19
|
||
| College Games: 13 College Snaps: 461 | ||
ESPN RATING: 93/100
|
||
|
247 RATING: 100/100
|
||
|
RIVALS RATING: 6.1 (100%)
|
||
| Player Comparison* (Similarity level) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Aidan O'Connell - Purdue |
|
79% |
| Bailey Zappe - Western Kentucky |
|
73% |
| Carter Bradley - South Alabama |
|
71% |
Draft Profile: Bio
Dante Moore, Detroit King's golden boy, burst onto the national scene as Michigan's most coveted quarterback prospect, capturing state championships as both a junior and senior while amassing over 9,880 career passing yards. His senior campaign produced 2,392 yards and 32 touchdowns against just three interceptions, earning him every major state award including Michigan's Gatorade Player of the Year. The five-star recruit commanded attention from coast to coast, ranked as the No. 2 overall prospect by ESPN and No. 3 by 247Sports, before initially committing to Oregon only to flip late to UCLA.Moore's freshman year at UCLA told a different tale entirely. Behind a porous offensive line and within Chip Kelly's struggling system, the highly-touted signal caller completed just 53.5% of his passes across nine appearances. His 1,610 yards, 11 touchdowns, and nine interceptions painted the picture of a talented quarterback learning harsh lessons about college football's unforgiving nature. The low point came during a three-game stretch where he threw pick-sixes in consecutive contests, ultimately leading to his benching. After taking 16 sacks and enduring the growing pains that humbled many elite recruits, Moore made the decision to enter the transfer portal following UCLA's disappointing season.
His return to Oregon represents one of college football's most intriguing redemption narratives. Rather than seeking immediate playing time elsewhere, Moore accepted a backup role behind Dillon Gabriel, utilizing a redshirt year to rebuild his confidence and refine his craft. The limited action he saw in 2024 - completing 7 of 8 passes for 49 yards across five appearances - might seem insignificant statistically, but it showcased a quarterback learning patience and preparation. Now poised to inherit an offense that has produced back-to-back Heisman Trophy finalists, Moore enters 2025 as one of college football's most compelling comeback stories and a potential top-level talent seeking to fulfill his immense promise.
Scouting Report: Strengths
- Quick release mechanics help him get the ball out rapidly, minimizing sack opportunities against aggressive pass rushes.
- Pocket presence improved significantly during his year learning behind Gabriel, showing better feel for pressure and sliding within the pocket.
- Ball placement on intermediate routes demonstrates precision, particularly when working the middle of the field against zone coverage.
- Mental processing speed allows him to identify coverages pre-snap and adjust protection calls with increasing confidence and command.
- Competitive fire burns bright in crucial moments, displaying the kind of clutch gene that drove his high school championship runs.
- Leadership qualities emerged during his redshirt season, earning respect from teammates through his work ethic and professional approach to development.
- Arm strength and velocity combination allows him to drive balls through tight windows with impressive zip and authority.
- Deep ball accuracy shines brightest when he has time to set his feet and deliver strikes downfield with excellent touch.
Scouting Report: Weaknesses
- Decision-making under pressure still shows concerning tendencies, especially when his first read gets covered and he's forced to work through progressions.
- Rushing ability grades poorly, offering minimal threat as a designed runner and limiting offensive coordinator creativity in red zone packages.
- Frame and build suggest he may struggle absorbing punishment from NFL-caliber pass rushers throughout a full professional season.
- Short passing accuracy remains inconsistent, particularly on quick slants and bubble screens where timing and precision are paramount.
- Mobility limitations become apparent when forced to escape pressure, lacking the burst to consistently extend plays with his legs.
Scouting Report: Summary
Moore's NFL ceiling hinges entirely on whether his deep ball prowess can overcome glaring deficiencies in the short passing game. His ability to attack vertically with precision represents his clearest path to pro success, but the inconsistency on quick slants and bubble screens that plagued him at UCLA remains a legitimate concern. The lightning-quick release he's developed gives him a fighting chance against NFL speed rushers, yet his limited mobility means he'll need that release mechanism to be flawless since escape routes remain largely unavailable.NFL offensive coordinators will salivate over his arm strength and downfield accuracy while simultaneously worrying about his effectiveness in the modern NFL's quick-game emphasis. His frame presents durability questions that can't be ignored, particularly when considering the punishment absorbed during his UCLA stint behind a poor offensive line. The maturation he showed during his redshirt year suggests improved decision-making capabilities, but the fundamental athletic limitations that restrict his rushing threat will force offenses to be more predictable in their play-calling approach.
The development path forward requires Moore to dramatically improve his short passing precision while maintaining the deep ball excellence that represents his calling card. His quick release and arm talent provide a legitimate foundation for NFL success, but the rushing deficiencies and frame concerns create a relatively narrow margin for error. Offensive systems built around pocket passing concepts will find value in his skill set, though his lack of dual-threat capability limits the creative packages available. If he can prove the short passing struggles were more about UCLA's dysfunction than personal limitations, Moore possesses the tools to develop into a serviceable NFL starter, but the physical and athletic constraints suggest he'll always need the right system and protection to maximize his effectiveness.
How other scouting services rate Dante Moore (Overall Rank)
All Scouts AverageOverall Rank
171.0
All Scouts AveragePosition Rank
16.0
*Percentile Ranking in Player's Position Group (NFL Combine Historical Data): This percentile reflects how a player's specific statistics rank
in comparison to historical performances at the NFL Combine, specifically within their position group. A higher percentile indicates a better performance.
For instance, being in the 90th percentile for a particular stat means the player outperformed 90% of their peers in that category.
*Similarity Percentage: This percentage is calculated based on a comprehensive analysis of various factors, including height, weight, 40-yard dash times, on-field performance statistics, and overall player rating. The analysis is conducted against our database of draft prospects from 2021 to 2023. This similarity score helps in evaluating how closely a current prospect aligns with past prospects. It is important to note, however, that this score reflects similarities based on college production and attributes, and does not account for eventual success or performance in the NFL.
*Similarity Percentage: This percentage is calculated based on a comprehensive analysis of various factors, including height, weight, 40-yard dash times, on-field performance statistics, and overall player rating. The analysis is conducted against our database of draft prospects from 2021 to 2023. This similarity score helps in evaluating how closely a current prospect aligns with past prospects. It is important to note, however, that this score reflects similarities based on college production and attributes, and does not account for eventual success or performance in the NFL.