Justin Scott DT Miami |
NFL Draft Profile & Scouting Report
| Jersey: #5 SUB-POSITION: NT/DT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Updated: 08/03/2026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Draft Year: 2027 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FORTY time: 4.90 seconds (89%*) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jersey: #5 | |
| SUB-POSITION: NT/DT | |
| Last Updated: 08/03/2026 | |
| Draft Year: 2027 | |
| Forty time: 4.90 seconds (89%*) | |
| Overall Rating: |
87.2 / 100
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Average rating of opposition Offense player has faced | ||
| Offense Rating: |
|
77% |
| Click the links below to view how player ranks vs other prospects. | ||
| Tackling: |
|
62% |
| Pass Rush: |
|
79% |
| Run Defense: |
|
79% |
|
DRAFT PROJECTION:
1st - Mid
Overall Rank:
#21
Position rank:
#4 (DL)
|
||
| College Games: 26 College Snaps: 565 | ||
ESPN RATING: 88/100
|
||
247 RATING: 98/100
|
||
RIVALS RATING: 6.1 (100%)
|
||
| Player Comparison* (Similarity level) | ||
|---|---|---|
| T.J. Sanders - South Carolina |
|
92% |
| Ruke Orhorhoro - Clemson |
|
89% |
| DeMarvin Leal - Texas A&M |
|
86% |
Draft Profile: Bio
Scott did not take up football until high school at Chicago's St. Ignatius, where he had focused on basketball. He developed quickly enough to start at both defensive line and offensive guard, posting 42 tackles, 13 for loss and 4.5 sacks as a junior, then earning an All-American Bowl invite and Illinois all-state honors as a senior.A consensus five-star and top-15 national prospect, he committed to Ohio State before flipping to Miami in November 2023, and landed on Bruce Feldman's Freaks List for his testing before playing a college snap. He worked as a backup as a true freshman in 2024, finishing with seven tackles and a sack across twelve games.
His role grew as a sophomore. Scott appeared in all sixteen games in 2025 and posted 23 tackles, 6.5 for loss and two sacks, with both of those sacks and a forced fumble coming in a breakout performance against Virginia Tech.
Scouting Report: Strengths
- Rare get-off for a 298-pound three-technique, beating guards out of their stance
- Holds up against both run and pass, scheme-flexible starter value
- Closed Virginia Tech with two sacks and four total pressures
- Length lets him stack and shed, keeping his frame clean against single blocks
- Held up on 505 snaps across all sixteen games of a deep playoff run
- Plays with active hands and a quick swipe to clear the rusher's lane
- Four stops against Pittsburgh showed the disruption travels on early downs
Scouting Report: Weaknesses
- Counting production lags the talent, with only two sacks on the year
- Tackling finish wobbles, five misses on a modest tackle total
- Frame is on the lean side for holding up against interior doubles
Scouting Report: Summary
Scott came to Miami as a five-star and looks the part of a movement three-technique, with a get-off that is unusual for a 298-pounder and the length to keep blockers off his chest. He holds up against both run and pass, the profile of a scheme-flexible starter rather than a one-trick interior man, and the flashes were loud: two sacks and four pressures at Virginia Tech, four stops against Pittsburgh, and steady reps deep into Miami's playoff schedule across sixteen games.The catch is that the production has not yet matched the traits. Two sacks understates how often he won the rep, but it is also a reminder that the finish and the rush plan are works in progress. He missed five tackles on a tackle total that was already modest, and the lean frame can get moved when guards get hands on him in the run game. He is a player evaluators talk themselves up on through the tape rather than the box score.
Bet on the movement skills and the age, and there is a long-term interior starter here who can rush the passer from over the guard. The floor is a rotational disruptor who holds a role early; the ceiling arrives if the hand counters and the tackle finish catch up to the first step. That spread still grades inside the first round on traits.
How other scouting services rate Justin Scott (Overall Rank)
All Scouts AverageOverall Rank
16.3
All Scouts AveragePosition Rank
2.0
*Percentile Ranking in Player's Position Group (NFL Combine Historical Data): This percentile reflects how a player's specific statistics rank
in comparison to historical performances at the NFL Combine, specifically within their position group. A higher percentile indicates a better performance.
For instance, being in the 90th percentile for a particular stat means the player outperformed 90% of their peers in that category.
*Similarity Percentage: This percentage is calculated based on a comprehensive analysis of various factors, including height, weight, 40-yard dash times, on-field performance statistics, and overall player rating. The analysis is conducted against our database of draft prospects from 2021 to 2023. This similarity score helps in evaluating how closely a current prospect aligns with past prospects. It is important to note, however, that this score reflects similarities based on college production and attributes, and does not account for eventual success or performance in the NFL.
*Similarity Percentage: This percentage is calculated based on a comprehensive analysis of various factors, including height, weight, 40-yard dash times, on-field performance statistics, and overall player rating. The analysis is conducted against our database of draft prospects from 2021 to 2023. This similarity score helps in evaluating how closely a current prospect aligns with past prospects. It is important to note, however, that this score reflects similarities based on college production and attributes, and does not account for eventual success or performance in the NFL.
