Sam Roush
Sam Roush  TE  Stanford | NFL Draft 2026 Souting Report - Portrait Image
Sam Roush
Height
6-6
Weight
267
College
Stanford
Position
TE
Class
Senior
Home town
Nashville, TN
84.7
Player Rating
4
PositionRank (TE)
4.7
FortyYD Time
Receptions
49
Rec YDs
545
Rec TDs
2
Rec AVG
11.1

Sam Roush TE Stanford |
NFL Draft Profile & Scouting Report

Jersey: #86 ROLE: Inline Multi-Role TE
Last Updated: 03/01/2026
Draft Year: 2026
FORTY time: 4.70 seconds (70%*)
Age: 22.11 DOB: 09/06/2003
Bowl Invite: Senior Bowl
Measurables:
Height: 6-6 (82%*) Weight: 267 (86%*)
Hands: 10 (58%*) Arm: 30 5/8 (5%*) Span: 76 4/8 (12%*)
Forty: 4.70 (C) (70%*) Shut: 4.37 (C) (52%*) Ten YD: 1.61 (C) (72%*)
Vert: 38.5 (C) (96%*) Broad: 126 (C) (96%*)
3Cone: 7.08 (C) (67%*) Bench: 25 (C) (87%*)
0% 100%
(C) - NFL Combine (P) - Pro Day (O) - Other (HS) -Estimated from High School Combine
For an explanation of how the (HS) data is calculated see this article
Jersey: #86
ROLE: Inline Multi-Role TE
Last Updated: 03/01/2026
Draft Year: 2026
Forty time: 4.70 seconds (70%*)
Age: 22.11 DOB: 09/06/2003
Bowl Invite: Senior Bowl
Measurables:
0% 100%
Height: 6-6 (82%*) Weight: 267 (86%*)
Hands: 10 (58%*) Arm: 30 5/8 (5%*)
Span: 76 4/8 (12%*)
Forty: 4.70 (C) (70%*) Shut: 4.37 (C) (52%*)
10Yd: 1.61 (C) (72%*)
Vert: 38.5 (C) (96%*) Broad: 126 (C) (96%*)
3Cone: 7.08 (C) (67%*) Bench: 25 (C) (87%*)
(C) - NFL Combine (P) - Pro Day (O) - Other
(HS) -Estimated from High School Combine
For an explanation of how the (HS) data is calculated see this article
Overall Rating: 84.7 / 100
Average rating of opposition Defense player has faced
Defense Rating:
81%
Click the links below to view how player ranks vs other prospects.
QB Rating When targeted: 74.3
Hands:
62%
Short Receiving:
68%
Intermediate Routes:
76%
Deep Threat:
65%
Blocking:
65%
DRAFT PROJECTION: 3rd
Overall Rank: #84 Position rank: #4 (TE)
College Games: 48 College Snaps: 2478
Grade: 4 ESPN  Stars 4 ESPN  Stars ESPN RATING: 81/100
Grade: 247 Sports 4  Stars 247 Sports 90 Stars 247 RATING: 90/100
Grade: 4 Stars 4 Stars RIVALS RATING: 5.8 (95%)
Player Comparison* (Similarity level)
AJ Barner - Michigan
87%
Josh Whyle - Cincinnati
83%
Cade Otton - Washington
78%
Chicago Bears Drafted: ROUND: 3 - Pick Number: 69 (CHI)
Draft Profile: Bio
Sam Roush was born in Atlanta but calling him a Georgia kid would be selling his story short. His family moved seven times across three continents before he settled at Lipscomb Academy in Nashville, with stops in Kuala Lumpur and Jakarta along the way. In Indonesia, he played rugby for the Jakarta Komodo Rugby Club, and during high school he competed on a world championship X-Prize Ocean Quest Engineering team, the kind of resume detail that makes you do a double take. Football bloodlines run thick in this family, though: his father Luke played defensive back at Duke, his maternal grandfather Phil Olsen suited up for the Rams, Broncos, and Bills, and his great uncle is Pro Football Hall of Famer Merlin Olsen. Roush earned Tennessee Co-Defensive Player of the Year honors as a senior in 2021 and helped lead Lipscomb to a D2-AA state championship, drawing four-star ratings from ESPN (81/100), 247 Sports (90/100), and Rivals (5.8/95%).

Stanford got a prospect who needed time to cook, and Roush never tried to rush the process. He appeared in all 48 games across his four-year Cardinal career, working his way from special teams as a freshman in 2022 to a full-time starter by his junior season. His sophomore year in 2023 produced 28 catches for 288 yards across 10 starts, highlighted by a seven-catch, 61-yard day against Washington State that hinted at what was coming. As a junior in 2024, he started all 12 games and pulled in 40 receptions for 344 yards and two touchdowns while picking up ACC All-Academic Team honors. The numbers climbed every single year, and by his senior campaign the arrow was pointing steeply upward.

Roush's 2025 season was comfortably his best. He finished with 49 catches for 545 yards and two touchdowns, ranking second on the team in both receptions and receiving yards while leading all ACC tight ends in receiving yardage. An eight-catch, 104-yard performance against Pittsburgh made him just the eighth Stanford tight end to crack 100 receiving yards in a game since 1995, and a 69-yard catch-and-run touchdown against Boston College showcased a gear that his size would suggest he does not have. He became one of only five FBS tight ends with multiple 50-plus yard receptions during the season. The accolades stacked up accordingly: All-ACC Second Team from the coaches, the Go Bowling Military Bowl STEM Scholar-Athlete award, and both the Al Masters Award and Tommy Vardell Award as a senior. He closed his career with 34 starts, 30 of them consecutive, and earned a Senior Bowl invitation that gave NFL evaluators an extended look at the complete package.
Scouting Report: Strengths
  • Combine testing was a revelation for a 267-pound man. A 38.5-inch vertical (96th percentile) and 10-foot-6 broad jump (96th percentile) are freakish explosion numbers, the best vertical of any tight end above 265 pounds by four and a half inches.
  • His 87 athleticism score ranked third among all tight ends at the Combine, and his 91.7 SPORQ percentile clears the critical 90th-percentile threshold that separates future contributors from roster fillers at the position.
  • Ran a weight-adjusted 3-cone (7.08) that compares favorably to Sam LaPorta and was faster straight up than Darren Waller and Kyle Pitts. For a guy tipping 267, that kind of agility in tight spaces is genuinely unusual.
  • Understands the full tight end job description and does not flinch at the dirty work. Lines up inline without complaint, gets to the second level on outside zone, and holds his ground in pass protection when edge rushers try to work inside.
  • The intermediate game between the numbers from 12 to 18 yards is where he does his best work. He finds soft spots in zone with a feel that looks natural, gives the quarterback a massive target on third down, and has the awareness to sit or drift based on what the coverage shows.
  • Production climbed every single year in a run-first Stanford offense that never featured him as a primary weapon. Going from 28 catches to 40 to 49 while adding a 69-yard score tells you there is more in the tank when the passing game actually asks for him.
  • Carries himself with maximum effort whether the ball is coming his way or not. Runs off safeties to clear space, finishes blocks 20 yards downfield, competes on every snap without being told. Coaching staffs fall in love with that makeup.
  • Better with the ball in his hands than his testing speed would suggest. Runs through arm tackles, keeps his legs churning, and showed real balance in traffic on that Boston College touchdown that covered 69 yards.
Scouting Report: Weaknesses
  • Drops are a legitimate concern that showed up consistently on tape. Too many catchable balls hit him in the chest and bounced away, and at times he shortened his arms when defenders closed on him at the catch point. The hands grade needs to improve significantly.
  • Blocking technique gets loose when he widens his base too much at the point of attack. He lunges forward, drops his head, and winds up on the ground on reps he should finish. To his credit, he showed the ability to self-correct at the Combine, adjusting quickly on the sled after getting high initially.
  • Route breaks lack the snap required to create immediate separation at the NFL level. He relies on length and positioning more than crisp footwork to get open, which will be a tougher sell against linebackers and safeties who can match his size.
  • Ball tracking on deeper throws is inconsistent. He misjudges landing spots too often, either pulling up short or running past the ball, which limits how much a coordinator can trust him as a vertical seam threat despite the explosion numbers.
  • The 74.3 passer rating when targeted is a below-average mark that reflects both the drops and some inconsistency in creating genuine separation on his routes. NFL defensive coordinators will test whether that number improves against tighter coverage.
Scouting Report: Summary
Indianapolis changed the conversation on Sam Roush. Before the Combine, the tape showed a well-coached, ascending tight end from a run-first Stanford system who did a little bit of everything without doing any one thing at an eye-popping level. The athletic testing told a different story entirely. A 267-pound man has no business posting a 38.5-inch vertical and a 10-foot-6 broad jump, let alone running a three-cone faster than Kyle Pitts and showing agility on a weight-adjusted basis that compares to Sam LaPorta. That 87 athleticism score, third among all tight ends, forced evaluators to look at the film with different eyes, and what you see when you go back is a player whose physical ceiling was never fully tapped in an offense that leaned on the ground game.

The fit that maximizes Roush is a traditional scheme that values inline tight ends and asks them to wear multiple hats. Think Baltimore's tight end rotation, or what San Francisco does with their multi-tight end personnel groupings: block on early downs, release into routes off play-action, contribute in pass protection, and give the quarterback a trustworthy target on third and medium. He is not a move tight end who should be split out wide on every third down, but he is far more than a blocking specialist. That steady production curve at Stanford, improving his catch totals and yardage every year despite the offense never centering around him, suggests a player who will only produce more when a coaching staff actually designs touches for him. Red zone and play-action heavy offenses should have him circled.

The drops are real, and that 74.3 passer rating when targeted is not something you can hand-wave away. His route breaks need to get sharper, and the blocking technique requires a position coach willing to invest daily reps in his footwork and hand placement. Those are fair concerns. But the athletic testing puts a new floor and ceiling on this evaluation that the pre-Combine tape alone did not reveal. Roush is a high-character, ascending player with legitimate NFL size, verified explosion, bloodlines steeped in professional football, and the kind of work ethic that coaches trust. He played against quality competition throughout his ACC career and improved every single season. The tight end position rewards patience and development more than almost any spot on the roster, and Roush's trajectory says he is not close to finished yet. An NFL team that grabs him on Day 2 is getting a player with a real chance to grow into a starting-caliber TE2 who can spot-start without hurting you and whose athletic upside gives him a path to more than that if the technical pieces come together.

Sam Roush percentiles vs other Tight Ends (NFL Combine historically - higher value represents better perfomance)

How other scouting services rate Sam Roush (Overall Rank)

All Scouts AverageOverall Rank
86.6
All Scouts AveragePosition Rank
5.0
*Percentile Ranking in Player's Position Group (NFL Combine Historical Data): This percentile reflects how a player's specific statistics rank in comparison to historical performances at the NFL Combine, specifically within their position group. A higher percentile indicates a better performance. For instance, being in the 90th percentile for a particular stat means the player outperformed 90% of their peers in that category.

*Similarity Percentage: This percentage is calculated based on a comprehensive analysis of various factors, including height, weight, 40-yard dash times, on-field performance statistics, and overall player rating. The analysis is conducted against our database of draft prospects from 2021 to 2023. This similarity score helps in evaluating how closely a current prospect aligns with past prospects. It is important to note, however, that this score reflects similarities based on college production and attributes, and does not account for eventual success or performance in the NFL.