Reuben Fatheree II OT Texas A&M | NFL Draft Profile & Scouting Report
Reuben Fatheree II OT Texas A&M
NFL Draft Profile & Scouting Report
| SUB-POSITION: Right Tackle | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Updated: 09/21/2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Draft Year: 2025 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 40 time: 5.35 seconds (32%*) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Age: 22.1 DOB: 11/21/2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SHARE THIS PROFILE:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SUB-POSITION: Right Tackle | |
| Last Updated: 09/21/2024 | |
| Draft Year: 2025 | |
| 40 time: 5.35 seconds (32%*) | |
| Age: 22.1 DOB: 11/21/2002 | |
|
SHARE THIS PROFILE:
|
| Overall Rating: | 76.7 / 100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating of opposition Defense player has faced | ||
| Defense Rating: |
|
74% |
| Click the links below to view how player ranks vs other prospects. | ||
| Pass Blocking: |
|
75% |
| Run Blocking: |
|
68% |
|
DRAFT PROJECTION:
UDFA
Overall Rank:
#333
Position rank:
#66
|
||
| College Games: 37 College Snaps: 1634 | ||
ESPN RATING: 83/100
College Combine Results
|
||
|
247 RATING: 94/100
|
||
|
RIVALS RATING: 6.0 (98%)
|
||
| Player Comparison* (Similarity level) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Luke Tenuta - Virginia Tech |
|
95% |
| Andrew Stueber - Michigan |
|
86% |
| Ethan Driskell - Marshall |
|
85% |
Draft Profile: Bio
Reuben Fatheree II, a standout offensive tackle from Texas A&M, made an immediate impact upon joining the Aggies. As a true freshman in 2021, he started nine games and earned a spot on the Coaches' Freshman All-SEC Team and FWAA Freshman All-America Team. His sophomore year saw him start all 12 games at right tackle, showcasing his durability and consistency.Fatheree II's journey to college football stardom began at Foster High School in Richmond, Texas, where he excelled as a two-sport athlete in football and basketball. His prowess on the gridiron earned him first-team all-district honors in his freshman and sophomore years. Recognized as a consensus 4-star recruit by major outlets like 247 Sports, Rivals, and ESPN, Fatheree II brought high expectations to College Station.
At Texas A&M, Fatheree II's impact was immediate and significant. In his freshman year, he not only secured a starting role but also garnered multiple awards, including the Offensive Top Newcomer and Most Improved Awards. His sophomore campaign further solidified his position as a key player on the offensive line, helping lead the offense to impressive performances, including a season-high 273 rushing yards against No. 6 LSU. Unfortunately, his junior year was hampered by injuries, limiting his appearances to just five games.
Scouting Report: Strengths
- Prototype tackle frame with telephone pole arms and a wide wingspan, creating a massive blockade for edge rushers
- Explosive get-off at the snap, firing out low and hard to establish leverage in the run game
- Light feet for a big man, showing the lateral quicks to mirror and match in pass pro
- Heavy hands with a jarring initial punch, consistently jolting defenders off their rush track
- Scheme versatile, equally adept at drive blocking in gap schemes and reaching/cutting off in zone concepts
- Natural knee bender who plays with consistent pad level, maximizing his length and power
- High football IQ with the mental processing to quickly diagnose and pick up stunts and blitzes
- Blue-collar worker with a lunch pail mentality, continually honing his craft and adding tools to his arsenal
Scouting Report: Weaknesses
- Raw in his pass set technique, occasionally opening the gate too early and creating a soft edge
- Tendency to play over his toes in pass pro, leaving him susceptible to push-pull moves and inside counters
- Hand placement can be scattershot, often landing outside the framework and limiting his ability to control blocks
- Medical red flags from junior year raise durability concerns and could impact draft stock
- Needs to develop a stronger anchor to avoid getting walked back into the pocket against power rushers
Scouting Report: Summary
Fatheree II enters the NFL draft as a raw talent with intriguing physical tools but significant technical flaws. His imposing frame and flashes of athleticism are offset by inconsistent performance and limited game experience due to his injury-shortened junior season.At the NFL level, Fatheree II profiles as a developmental tackle prospect. His versatility in blocking schemes offers some appeal, but his current skill set indicates a steep learning curve. Teams with established offensive lines may view him as a long-term project.
Fatheree II's transition to the NFL will demand extensive technical refinement and physical development. His ceiling remains that of a potential starter, but the path to that role is uncertain and likely prolonged. Teams drafting Fatheree II will be gambling on their ability to maximize his physical gifts and transform him into a reliable offensive lineman.
Written By:
Wyatt Brooks (SEC)
Reuben Fatheree II percentiles vs other Offensive Tackles (NFL Combine historically - higher value represents better perfomance)
How other scouting services rate Reuben Fatheree II (Overall Rank)
All Scouts AverageOverall Rank
486.0
All Scouts AveragePosition Rank
82.0
*Percentile Ranking in Player's Position Group (NFL Combine Historical Data): This percentile reflects how a player's specific statistics rank
in comparison to historical performances at the NFL Combine, specifically within their position group. A higher percentile indicates a better performance.
For instance, being in the 90th percentile for a particular stat means the player outperformed 90% of their peers in that category.
*Similarity Percentage: This percentage is calculated based on a comprehensive analysis of various factors, including height, weight, 40-yard dash times, on-field performance statistics, and overall player rating. The analysis is conducted against our database of draft prospects from 2021 to 2023. This similarity score helps in evaluating how closely a current prospect aligns with past prospects. It is important to note, however, that this score reflects similarities based on college production and attributes, and does not account for eventual success or performance in the NFL.
*Similarity Percentage: This percentage is calculated based on a comprehensive analysis of various factors, including height, weight, 40-yard dash times, on-field performance statistics, and overall player rating. The analysis is conducted against our database of draft prospects from 2021 to 2023. This similarity score helps in evaluating how closely a current prospect aligns with past prospects. It is important to note, however, that this score reflects similarities based on college production and attributes, and does not account for eventual success or performance in the NFL.