RAIDERS MOCK DRAFT GRADE C+

Raiders Mock Draft 4.0 C+

URL raiders-mock-draft-40-2639

Letter grade with a four-component score, written analysis, and a pick-by-pick breakdown for every selection in this saved mock.

My Mock Drafts →
Grade another draft →
C+

Las Vegas Raiders

Ward is the plan now, and the Raiders grade out a C+.

by Zobster · 2025 NFL Draft · 6 picks · 0 steals · 5 reaches
Value D+
Need B
Trades B-
Future B-

If confidence were a draft strategy, the Raiders would have aced it. Tyler Baron at pick 103 is 86 spots clear of where he belonged. Some smart calls, some head-scratchers, and a C+ in the wash.

The whole projection now runs through Cam Ward; hit there and everything else looks smarter. The running back spot stays a question, and it was the one they most needed an answer at.

Job largely done: edge rusher settled and 5 of 8 of the wish list covered. The offense got the lion's share of the attention.

If Cam Ward and a couple of the gambles land, hindsight will be kinder than this grade.

Pick-by-Pick

R1.7 · Pick 7 · Cam Ward · QB · rank 27
In pick No. 7 they get the arm they will build around, a steep price for the projection. A clean fit for the roster.
R2.7 · Pick 39 · Andrew Mukuba · S · rank 69
The board screamed and they did not listen, reaching into the next round for Andrew Mukuba. A quiet depth add at a thin-ish spot.
R2.31 · Pick 63 · Tate Ratledge · OG · rank 59
A reasonable price with a little left over, Tate Ratledge in slot 63. The biggest hole on the depth chart just got a whole lot smaller.
R4.7 · Pick 103 · Tyler Baron · DE-EDGE · rank 189
A real head-scratcher, Tyler Baron in the Round 4 slot is miles ahead of his ranking. They walked in needing this and walked out with it.
R6.7 · Pick 167 · Azareye'h Thomas · CB · rank 222
Azareye'h Thomas at the 167th overall pick is a steep price for a hunch, hard to square with any board. Better still, it is exactly the hole they had to fill.
R7.7 · Pick 199 · Moose Muhammad III · WR · rank 225
Value said wait; Moose Muhammad III in No. 199 says they were not listening. This was priority one on the needs board, and now it is handled.