CJ West DT Indiana | NFL Draft Profile & Scouting Report
CJ West DT Indiana
NFL Draft Profile & Scouting Report
SUB-POSITION: NT/DT | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last Updated: 01/20/2025 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Draft Year: 2025 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 time: 5.20 seconds (29%*) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SHARE THIS PROFILE:
|
SUB-POSITION: NT/DT | |
Last Updated: 01/20/2025 | |
Draft Year: 2025 | |
40 time: 5.20 seconds (29%*) | |
SHARE THIS PROFILE:
|
Overall Rating: | 82.1 / 100 | |
---|---|---|
Average rating of opposition Offense player has faced | ||
Offense Rating: |
|
79% |
Click the links below to view how player ranks vs other prospects. | ||
Tackling: |
|
52% |
Pass Rush: |
|
83% |
Run Defense: |
|
96% |
DRAFT PROJECTION:
6th
Overall Rank:
#207
Position rank:
#44
|
||
College Games: 51 College Snaps: 1948 | ||
|
||
|
||
|
Player Comparison* (Similarity level) | ||
---|---|---|
Jaquelin Roy - LSU |
|
80% |
Haskell Garrett - Ohio State |
|
76% |
Neil Farrell Jr. - LSU |
|
69% |
Draft Profile: Bio
A journeyman interior defender who grinded his way through the MAC before landing in the Big Ten, CJ West brings an interesting mix of production and limitations to the NFL draft conversation. After starting 35 games at Kent State, where he accumulated 110 tackles and 19.5 TFLs, West transferred to Indiana for his final season. The 6'2", 317-pound defensive tackle has shown flashes against top competition, though his performances against programs like Georgia and Texas A&M revealed both promise and concerning limitations.West's path from Nazareth Academy to the MAC and finally to Indiana illustrates his developmental trajectory. His high school career peaked with a state runner-up finish after winning a championship the previous year. At Kent State, he gradually improved each season, culminating in seven TFLs and two sacks in 2023, though consistency remained an issue. His transfer to Indiana provided a final test against higher-level competition.
The tape shows a player who can impact games when properly utilized but also exposes technical flaws that could limit his NFL ceiling. While he ranked fourth nationally among interior defenders in tackles for loss or no gain (14) in 2023, he also struggled with fundamental aspects like pad level and hand placement. His snap-to-snap consistency varies significantly, particularly against more physically dominant offensive lines.
Scouting Report: Strengths
- Initial burst off the snap can catch interior linemen off guard, particularly effective when shooting gaps in obvious running situations
- Natural leverage from his compact frame helps him win the pad level battle early in reps, though this advantage often fades as drives progress
- Shows good lateral movement skills for his size, able to work down the line against zone runs when he maintains proper technique
- Flashes an effective swim move and occasional bull rush, particularly productive against lesser competition
- Demonstrates ability to recognize blocking schemes and react accordingly, though execution isn't always consistent
- High-effort player who will chase plays from behind and fight through entire defensive series
- Has faced quality competition in non-conference games, providing good evaluation tape against NFL-caliber opponents
- Versatile enough to line up in multiple techniques, offering some scheme flexibility for NFL defenses
Scouting Report: Weaknesses
- Significant snap reaction issues - consistently late off the ball despite aligning over center, negating his natural explosiveness
- Struggles mightily with pad level maintenance - stands up far too quickly and gets controlled by better offensive linemen
- Hand placement is a major concern - lands outside too frequently and lacks the length to recover once blockers establish position
- Shows concerning balance issues, particularly when forced to redirect or handle down blocks
- Tackling technique is problematic - leaves his feet too often and struggles to finish plays he creates in the backfield
Scouting Report: Summary
The tape doesn't lie - West brings the juice when he's turned loose in a single-gap front. Watch that UCF game opener where he demolished the guard with a quick swim move for a strip sack, or the way he consistently knifed through against MAC competition. He's got that natural leverage that makes guards uncomfortable, especially when he times up his get-off right. But then you flip on that Georgia tape, and you see the limitations - high pad level, struggling to disengage, getting washed out against double teams.In the NFL, he's going to win with that compact power and initial burst. His best reps came when Kent State let him attack upfield from the 3-technique, getting skinny through gaps and disrupting blocking schemes. That Central Connecticut State game really showcased it - two TFLs where he just exploded through the A-gap before the center could react. The problem is consistency - for every flash play, there's two reps where he stands up too high and gets controlled.
The team that drafts West in the late rounds is getting a rotational defensive tackle with clear rushing down potential. Put him in that 3-technique spot, let him pin his ears back and attack a single gap - that's where the film shows he can make an impact. The missed tackles and balance issues aren't going away, but in a focused role as a penetrating backup tackle, there's enough natural ability here to warrant the investment.
CJ West percentiles vs other Defensive Tackles (NFL Combine historically - higher value represents better perfomance)
How other scouting services rate CJ West (Overall Rank)
All Scouts AverageOverall Rank
169.5
All Scouts AveragePosition Rank
52.0
*Percentile Ranking in Player's Position Group (NFL Combine Historical Data): This percentile reflects how a player's specific statistics rank
in comparison to historical performances at the NFL Combine, specifically within their position group. A higher percentile indicates a better performance.
For instance, being in the 90th percentile for a particular stat means the player outperformed 90% of their peers in that category.
*Similarity Percentage: This percentage is calculated based on a comprehensive analysis of various factors, including height, weight, 40-yard dash times, on-field performance statistics, and overall player rating. The analysis is conducted against our database of draft prospects from 2021 to 2023. This similarity score helps in evaluating how closely a current prospect aligns with past prospects. It is important to note, however, that this score reflects similarities based on college production and attributes, and does not account for eventual success or performance in the NFL.
*Similarity Percentage: This percentage is calculated based on a comprehensive analysis of various factors, including height, weight, 40-yard dash times, on-field performance statistics, and overall player rating. The analysis is conducted against our database of draft prospects from 2021 to 2023. This similarity score helps in evaluating how closely a current prospect aligns with past prospects. It is important to note, however, that this score reflects similarities based on college production and attributes, and does not account for eventual success or performance in the NFL.